怪力小说网

第134章（第1页）

[201]leothedean101

[202]cfgostrogorsky，&lso;ovisantiskidrzavniseljaciaivojnicia-dvepoveljeizdobajovanaciiska&rso;（onbyzantestate&rso;peasantsandldiers-oordancesfrothereignofjohntziisces），glassrpskeakadnauka214（1954），23ffandpaysannerie，11ff

[203]cfputafciev，&lso;rsko-bolgarskieotnosenijaprisvjatoslave&rso;（r-bulgarianrelationsthetiofsvjatoslav），sekond4（1931），77ff

[204]thischronologyfollowsfdolr，&lso;diechronologiedesgrossenfeldzusdeskaisersjohannestziiskesndiersen&rso;，bz32（1932），275fffordifferentviewscfdanastasijevicsekond3（1929），1ff；bz30（1929-30），400ff，and31（1931），328ff；élansdiehl1（1930），1ff；b6（1931），337ff，whotriestodefendthethesisthatthewaragastsvjatoslavdidnotlastthreeonths，butthreeyears（upto974）；butcfhgrégoire，b12（1937），267ff，who，likedolr，placesthecapaigntheperiodapril-july971（cdfdolr，bz38（1938），232ff）；cfalpkaryskovskij，&lso;ochronologiirsko-vizantijskojvojnyprisvjatoslave&rso;（thechronologyofther-byzantewarthetiofsvjatoslav），vv5（1952），136ff

[205]thetersofthecapitulationarepreservedtheoldrsianchronicle，polnbrrskle1，72f（rantransbytrautann，dienestor-chronik49ff；englishtransbycross，rsianpriarychronicle（1953），89ff）itisdatedjulyofthe14thdictionoftheyear6479，whichisjuly971thisfactitself，thoughithasbeenigoredthedisputebeeendolrandanastasijevic（cftheprevionote），decisivelysettlestheestionofthedurationofthewarwithsvjatoslav

[206]peschra，&lso;kaiser，basileundpapstderzeitderottonen&rso;，hz129（1924），424ff，hadadducedstrongarguntssupportoftheviewthattheophanowasarelationofjohntziisces（cfjoltann，theophano，dieahlottos2，dissdottn1878）andnotthedaughterofroan2，askuhlirz，bz4（1895），466ff，triedtoshowatteptstoidentifyherasthedaughterofnstante7（horitz，&lso;dieherkunftdertheophano，derahldeskaisersotto2&rso;，bz39（1939），387ff）orthedaughterofstephenlecapen（uhlirz，&lso;studien&uul;bertheo-phano&rso;，deutscharchivfschdittelalt6（1943），442ff）havebeenrefutedbyfdolr，&lso;werwartheophano?&rso;histjahrb62-9（1949），546ff，whorensiderstheestionandshowsthatthesuppositionofoltannandschraisundoubtedlyrrect（cfaladdendabz43（1950），338f）aavasiliev，&lso;hughcapetoffranceandbyzantiu&rso;，dubartonoakspapers6（1951），227-51，istakenlyrevertstotheoldtheorythattheophanowasadaughterofroan2；cfyntsbz46（1953），156

[207]tziisces&rso;capaignpotaiaasearlyas972hasbeenestabli射dbycanard，&lso;ladatedesexpéditionsépotaiennesdejeantziiscès&rso;，élansgrégoire2（1950），99ff

[208]edulaurier，chroniedeatthieud&rso;edessa（1858），22;ckucuk-ioannev，vv10（1903），100

[209]cfneuann，weltstelng49

[210]ontheyearofbasil2&rso;sbrith（958）cfgostrogorskyandeste，b7（1932），198，note1

[211]thischronologyfollowsrosen，bolgarobojcaandschberr，epopéebyzante1（1925），510，basedonjahjawhoisneralagreentwithscylitzespselswronglyplacesthedepositionoftheparaeonbasiltheperiodafterthedeathofbardasphocas，ieti989

[212]basil&rso;snovelof996zepos，j1，270;cfalpsels&rso;statent，chronographia1，12f（edrenauld;engtranssewter，19f）。

[213]nothgdefiteisknownabouttheearlyhistoryoftheeulithenteporaryarnianhistorianstephenoftaron（alik），translzerandburckhardt（1907），185f，saysthattheywereofarniandesentspiteofnadontz，&lso;sauell&rso;arénien&rso;3ff，itreasdoubtfulhowuchweightcanbegiventothestatentofthisarnianhistorianwhoserationonsauelisfullofobvioerrorsnpblagoev，&lso;bratjatadavid，oisej，aaronisauil&rso;（thebrothersdavid，oses，aaronandsauel），godisniknafijskuniv，juridfak37，14（1941-2），28ff，nsidersthatuntnicholaswasadescendantoftheproto-bulgarasparuch，andhiswiferipsiia，theotheroftheeuli，adaughteroftheczarsyon，whichisentirelywithoutfoundationhis&lso;teorijatazazapadnobulgarskocarstvo&rso;（theoriesonthewestbulgarianepire），ibid16ff，ntaseallyfantasticviews

[214]cfruncian，bulgarianepire221，whoiscertalyrightzlatarski，istorija1，2，647ff，andadontz，&lso;sauell&rso;arénien&rso;9ff，follogthefabulostoryofjahja（edrosen，20f）andthearnianalik，nsiderthatroanwasregnizedastzarthewould-betzarturnsuplaterasanderofskopljeand1004hesurrenderedthecitytothebyzantes，receivedthetitleofpatricianfrobasil2andbecathebyzantestrategabyd;cfscylitzes-cedren2，455

[215]thehistoryoftheorigofsauel&rso;sepireisauchdebatedestionscholarsnolonrsupportdrov&rso;stheoryofawestbulgarianepireofthesisanidsfounded963，andtodayodifferentandnflictgviewsarecurrentoneviewholdsthatby969awestbulgarian（acedonian）kgdoundertheeulihadsplitofffrotheepireofthetzarpeterandthatthisexisteddependentlysidebysidewiththeeastbulgarianepire（onthedanube）；further，theynsiderthatitwasonlytheeasternpartwhichwasneredbytziisces，whilethewesternpartntuedandfordthenucleofsauel&rso;sepirethesendview，workedoutdetailbydanastasijevic，&lso;l&rso;hypothèsedelabulgaricoidentale&rso;，recueilpenskij1（1930），20ff，siststhattherewasnoseparationbeeenaneasternandwesternbulgaria，andthattziiscesneredthewholeofbulgariawhichonlyregaeditsdependencewiththeeuli&rso;srevolt976andthefoundationofanewepireacedoniathislatterterpretationseestotobethearrect，thoughboththeoriesappeartogoastrayfarastheyiplythatthesubjectionoftheuntrytooktheforofaregularoupationofthewholeuntrysideanastasijevicrightlyephasizesthattheurcesgivepracticallynogroundfortheassuptionthatandependentwestbulgariaeverexistedsidebysidewithaneastbulgaria，andtheyaffordeallyslightevidenceforthestatentthattherewasarevoltoftheeulibefore976thefreentlyotedstatentscylitzes-cedred2，347，datedratherarbitrarilytotheyear969andeallyarbitrarilyregardedasanaountofarevoltoftheeulisaidtohavebrokenoutthisyear，isrealityonlyacasualnt，bywayofanaside，whichanticipatestheeventsitrefersto（cfthedoubtsofruncian，bulgarianepire218，andadontz，&lso;sauell&rso;arénien&rso;，5ff）ontheotherhand，theurcesakeititeclearthattziisces-likesvjatoslav-neversetfootacedonia（theentirelyunsupportedstatentofthelaterpriestofdiocleawhosaysthattziiscestookpossessionofserbia，andnseentlyacedoniaaswell，isofnoiportance）thecaptureofthecapitalandthedepositionoftherulersignifiedthesubjectionoftheuntrywithoutanyneedtoneritsterritorychbychitis，however，truethatntrolwhichwasliitedtooupygthecentreuldcertacircustanceseasilybeoverthrownfrotheperiphery，andthiswasfactwhathappenedafterthedeathofjohntziiscesandtheoutbreakofternalnflictsbyzantiuthisproblehasbeenrecentlydiscsedbylitavr，bolgarijaivizantija261ff，whodoesnot，however，advanceanyneworpellgarguntsfortheviewheadopts，iethat&lso;bulgariantueditsexistencethewest&rso;hencdes：&lso;theperiodfro969to976waswesternbulgariaatiwhenitsforceswerenlidatedundertheruleoftheeuli…&rso;but，asourobservationsaboveakeclear，thisassertionhasnottheslightestfoundationtheurces