怪力小说网

第61章（第1页）

[41]pisides，heraclias2，108ff，edperti，p256

[42]cfedarkó，&lso;dieilitarischenreforndeskaisersherakleios&rso;，bulldel&rso;starchéolbulgare9（1935），110ff；&lso;fencestouraniennessurl&rso;évotiondel&rso;artilitairedesgrecs，desroasetdesbyzants&rso;，b10（1935），443ff，12（1937），119ff；&lso;leroledespeuplesnoadescavaliersdanslatransforationdel&rso;epireroaauxpreierssièclesduoyena&rso;，ib18（1948），85ff

[43]pisides，expedpers2，357，edperti，p114

[44]cfpernice，eraclio121alkulakovskij，istorija3，65，note4

[45]thishasbeenpreservedsebeos，transacler79thescriptionoftheletterreads：&lso;chosrov，chéridesdieux，atreetroidetoutelaterre，filsdugrandarazd，ànotreserviteur，ibécileetfa，héracli&rso;。

[46]kulakovstij，istorija3，72and74，rightlystressesthatthisrenewedretreatdicatesthatthecapaignsoftheyears624and625werelesssuessfulforthebyzanteeperorthanwouldappearfrotheaountoftheophanes312f

[47]afullaountofthesieofnstantople，basedonallavailableurces，isgivenbyfbarisic，&lso;lesièdenstantopleparlesavaresetlesslavesen626&rso;，b24（1954），371ff

[48]aordgtonicephor20fhewrotetoheracli：&lso;thesawayasyousaythatyourgodwaspresentedtotheoldansyon，ipresentyourslave，yn，toyourhands&rso;。

[49]onthechronologyseekulakovskij，istorija3，367ffcfalafrolow，&lso;lavraiecroixetlesexpeditionsd&rso;heraclienperse&rso;，reb11（1953），88ff

[50]ontheproblesncerngtheriseofsao&rso;sepireseebgrafenauer，&lso;novejsaliteraturaosaunjeniproblei&rso;（recentliteratureonsaoanditsprobles），zgodovskicapis4（1950），151ff

[51]nicephor24，9，whoalstates（p12，20）thatkuvrat&rso;suncleana，thefounderofthefederationofbulgariantribesthenortherncaucas，visitednstantople619，aeptedchristianityandwasgiventhetitleofpatricianapparentlykuvratwasaongsthisfollowersonthatoasionandwasleftbehdnstantopleasahosta;johnofnikiu（edzotenberg，p460）rerdsthatkuvratgrewupattheiperialurtandaeptedchristianitywhilehewasstillachildcfgostrogorsky，&lso;thebyzanteepiretheworldoftheseventhcentury&rso;，dop13（1959），15ff

[52]deadip，c29-36，pp122-64（edoravcsik-jenks）。

[53]thereliabilityofthisaounthasbeencriticizedbyed&uul;ler，sbdwienerakad20（1856），357ff，byfracki，knijzevnik1（1864），36ff，andradjugoslakad52（1880），141ff，andespeciallybyvjagic，archivfslavphilol17（1895），47ff，withtheresultthatithasbeennerallyaepted-ntrarytotheaountofnstanteporphyronti-thatthecroatsandserbsperatedtothebalkansabouttheyear600tortherwiththeotherslavtribesspiteoftheobjectionsofcertascholars，notablykgrot，izvestijakonstantabagrannorodnogooserbachichorvatach（theevidenceofnstanteporphyronitncerngtheserbaandcroats）（1880），kklajic，povesthrvata1（historyofcroatia）（1899），30ff，andradjugoslakad130（1897），11ff，nnodilo，historijaserdnjegavijeka（historyoftheiddleas），3（1905），433ff，thisviewhadhadthesupportofthehighestauthoritiesthefieldsofslavhistoryandphilology，cdgkjirecek，lniederle，ststanojevic，fsisicrecentlytherehasbeenareactionandithasbeenpotedoutthattherearenotsufficientgroundsforrejectgtheaountofnstante7which，thoughebroideredwithlendarydetails，isessencethoroughlyreliablecftherativearticlebydanastasijevic：sstanojevic，narodnaenciklopedija4（1929）81ff，whohiselfdefendsthetrorthessofporphyronit（cfalhisarticlenarodnaenciklopedija3，607ff）thestudyoftheproblehasbeenadvancedbytheiportantresearchoflhauptann（cfespeciallyhisarticle&lso;seobahrvataisrba&rso;（theigrationofthecroatsandserbs），jugoslistorcapis3（1937），30ff）ofparticularvaearethentsbybgrafenauer，prilogkriticiizvestajakonstantaporfironitaodoseljenjuhrvata&rso;（antributiontothecriticalevaationoftherationgivenbynstanteporphyronitontheiigrationofthecroats），histzbornik5（1952），1-56，whoanyrespectsfollowshauptann，butwhorightlyrejectshistheoryofthecaucasianorigoftheserbsandcroats，andoftheorigofthecroatianaristocracycfalfdvornik，theakgofthecentralandeasterneurope，london，1949，215ffandtheslavs，theirearlyhistoryandcivilization，boston，1956，62ff，andalthestiulatgdiscsionbyhgrégoire，&lso;l&rso;origeetlenodescroatesetdesserbes&rso;，b17（19445），88ff，whoprovidesauchfullerlistofurcesasthebasisofthewholevestigation，thoughonecannotagreewithhiwhenhetriestorelatethena&lso;croat&rso;to&lso;kuvrat&rso;，andcertalynotwhenhewouldliketoderivetheword&lso;serb&rso;fro&lso;serv&rso;，asdoesnstante7cfsteadgrafenauer，opcitandaaricq，b22（1952），345ffsiilarsugstionsncerngthenacroatcanalbefoundbury，laterroepire2（1sted，275f）andhoworth，journoftheanthropologicalstofgreatbritaandireland2（1882），224ffanexcellentsuaryofthewholeliteratureonthisprobleuptoapproxiately1925isgivenbysisic，povijest，236-65，thoughhiscriticissarelouredbyhisown&lso;anti-nstantian&rso;potofviewcfalthebibliographyistorijanarodajugoslavije（ahistoryofthepeoplesofyugoslavia）1（1953），101-3aparticularlyiportantrecentntributionisthatofbferjancic，vizantiskiizvori2，whotranslateseverythgnstanteporphyronithastosayncerngtheuthslavstoserbo-croat，andgivesanextensiventary，whichhediscsesalltheprevioliteratureseealfdvorniknstanteporphyronit：deadistrandoiperio，2，ntary，london，1962，94ff